REPORT. ISO/TR. First edition. Reference number . This document was drafted in accordance with the editorial rules of the ISO/IEC. (International Standard Risk Management ISO Draft Review) ISO , the international standard for Risk Management – ‘Risk Management. Hi:bigwave: Does anybody have a copy of the draft working document ISO they could share with little me? ttfn Ben.
|Published (Last):||19 October 2007|
|PDF File Size:||9.28 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||2.83 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
Although effects can also become risk sources, the way note 1 is phrased only leads to a short sighted view on what can be understood by effects. This is a new section isso the standard. The next steps will be a review of the comments submitted that will modify the text further and then a ballot by ISO members to move to the final publication.
It can be positive, negative or both.
The problem I have with drafr sentence is the parts between brackets. The title has slightly changed as well: From the comments made by the contributing experts it was clear that Annex A should be removed and instead the topic dealt with separately through a New Work item proposal to address ddraft management maturity.
The one remark I have is the note 1 on the definition of risk. Our main challenge was to find a fair and sensible balance between supplementing the chapter with necessary concepts and not losing sight of all other users. The most recent meeting in Jordan provided the impetus and key changes necessary to move the standard forward and out of its committee stages making it available for wider comment. The content between brackets should be left out.
Initially it was agreed that only minimal changes would be made to the standard while the committee looked at the potential for more substantial revision. The consequences are then the effects of uncertainty on the objectives related to the opportunity pursued.
More interpretations are possible, more definitions come into play and more options in the use of the standard are provided e. The decision to review ISO was taken at in Chicago in and now, 4 years later, a draft version of the proposed updates to the ISO document is available for users to see.
Revision of ISO 31000 Risk Management Guidelines – Draft available
The strengthened generic nature of the standard can hopefully provide for confidence is experts and end users who each have specific problems in risk but need to understand and communicate with others stakeholders.
It is important to keep in mind that we are not drafting an American or European standard, a public sector or financial services standard, but rather a generic international standard.
A common theme found in the comments was the addition of concepts or examples specific to countries or industries. The clauses on process has probably been the area that has received most comments during the revision.
ISO Risk Management Standard Draft available for comment.
The next steps of the revision process are translation into French 311004 by comments and ballots from the National Standardization Bodies. This view was formed at the Moscow meeting and stuck to while resolving the comments on the technical committee draft reviewed in Jordan. Two of these, the disruption and supply chain risk standards, have failed to make the grade and have recently been officially dropped, but the isp risk standard ISO is now in development with the national standards bodies of China and the UK jointly leading the work.
Articles Recognising threat – the importance of pre-incident surveillance. Below some of the changes to the version of ISO have been summarised sraft a few words on why the changes are being proposed:. Hosting services provided by: Because in my opinion, opportunities and threats are external risk sources in the same way as weaknesses and strengths are internal risk sources. The major task to accomplish is progress the revision of Isp Before being sent to ISO the draft of the DIS was endorsed by the working group WG2 and reviewed by an editorial team who checked for typographic issues and consistency across the different sections.
Find out more About Us. Care needed to be taken in in considering all the points raised and discussions on the right way forward took considerable time.
Comparing ISO 31000 (2009) with the draft ISO 31000 (2017) – Part 2
Continuity Forum Policy Working Group Members can contact us directly to discuss the process and to obtain copies of document for comment. The Commenting process provides a real opportunity for those with risk responsibilities to feedback to the committee on any issues or opportunities to improve the standard before 13004 becomes isk National and International standard.
The final DIS text has not dramatically changed the version and all steps in the process have been kept.
The revision for the ISO standard is to be finalized in The overall message of ISO stays the same that the risk management process is dgaft integrated part of strategic and operational management.
We can expect that the new version of ISO will be published at the end of or early in The process gives you the chance iao suggest areas you would like to see adapted or removed and even add new elements that would benefit users in the front line. Don’t be the weak link. In a series of articles we want to present and discuss the major changes that are to be expected.
Cyber There’s a good time coming However, more complex language has been edited and reduced and accordingly daft revised text is shorter and more precise and hopefully the user will find it much simpler to read. In general the changes are in the direction of a better wording and more complete coverage of what the notes want to convey.
Comparing ISO () with the draft ISO () – Part 2 –
The definitions still mentioned in the standard … the following apply are kept to a strict minimum and mainly those that have updated notes:. As this sentence was followed by 29 definitions that fully defined risk management the ISO way. The Working Group meets next time on July 10th — 14th, in San Francisco to work on finalizing the revision. There was considerable discussion on fundamental issues on the role of standards. Ultimately the decision was made to simplify the text and use other documents, such as ISO Guide 73 to provide additional drft to those that need it.
The changes in the revision only concern the notes to the definitions. For more information go to riskmanagement. In the same time period three other risk standards 13004 been proposed by ISO covering disruption related risk, supply chain risk management and legal risk.
The vision was to phrase a framework clause that provides guidance that is relevant for every possible user of the standard.