Lantz, A.: Intervjumetodik – Den professionellt genomförda intervjun (in Swedish). Studentlitteratur. () 6. Abrahamsen, P.: Samarbete, samverkan, samvaro. Kvale, Steinar Den kvalitativa forskningsintervjun. Studentlitteratur, Lund. Lantz, Annika Intervjumetodik. Studentlitteratur, Lund. Marander-Eklund. Author: Lantz, Annika, Publication year: Language: Swedish. Media class: Book. Publisher: W&W,. ISBN:
|Published (Last):||7 October 2009|
|PDF File Size:||10.26 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||12.98 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
The authors range from major classics in the field to newcomers from several countries presenting their research results. The results presented in this paper are based on two studies, part of a larger longitudinal project on teamwork on the shop-floor within LPS in manufacturing industry.
An investigation of the effects of different leadership styles and management policy on proactivity through team-learning processes might shed light on how leadership promotes proactivity, as results support the effects of team kntervjumetodik decision-making intervuumetodik reflecting management policy — on proactivity. Journal of Workplace Learning 27 1 In the first study we test a model of how CBC impact team proactivity through team learning.
LPS principles short work flows, focus on value-stream, standardization, and routinization limit autonomy and complexity, and are opposed to a job design that supports individual- and team learning see e. Three kinds of tasks were identified. In the second study we investigate qualitative differences between how close-to oantz specialists describe their CBC with stagnant teams 1 SD below mean on team proactivity in study 1 and proactive teams 1 SD above mean in study 1and how managers support and engage in CBC.
Annika Intervjumetodiik, Kin Andersson.
Annika Lantz Friedrich – Stockholm University
To reduce nonvalue-adding activities means to standardize work procedures and hence to reduce autonomy. The principles of job design of production tasks, e. A conclusion is that the potential for team-learning processes and proactivity lies in those work activities that are not standardized, and good inter-team collaboration in the work-flow.
Lean production and team-work are based on seemingly opposing principles of job design, and yet often combined in production systems within industry. Creativity and Innovation in Organizations.
Annika Lantz Friedrich, Daniela Ulber. We finish with an overview of the main findings and discuss how contextual and situational aspects impact team processes, and how factors on individual, team and organizational levels interact.
Annika Lantz, Peter Friedrich. This book addresses the links between unemployment, precariousness work and health risks from various scientific frames of reference as well as those of policy-makers.
Many organizations have structured their work around teams, and most people have an experience of teamwork where they have felt the joy of accomplishing things together, learning from others, and getting good and rewarding results.
Team learning mediates the relationship between participative decision-making and inter team collaboration on team proactive behaviour. Results are based on a cross-sectional study and cannot be interpreted causally yet.
2D [NADA, KTH], [HMI] latest information
We hypothesize that job design parameters team participation in decision making regarding job routines, participative leadership style, cross-functional cooperation enhance team proactivity via team learning building shared meaning as a mediator.
Reflectivity and group initiative show the largest effects on self-organizational activities. The non-standardized tasks take very little time, and are not more cognitively demanding than the main tasks, and yet impact team proactivity to a considerable extent as they give input to building a shared meaning of work.
How can such proactive behavior be supported? How can the paradox between the standardization of work and innovative teamwork be understood? It is not always that teams are effective.
Research methods in HCI, formdi09
Supportive leadership has an effect on group processes that in turn impact group initiative and self-organizational activities and itnervjumetodik direct effect on group initiative as well. There are many reasons for why people work in teams, including managerial beliefs that teamwork can be beneficial to organizational effectiveness. The tentative qualitative results b show differences between stake-holders input to stagnant and vibrant teams.
International Journal of Knowledge-Based Organizations 3 2 Our aim is to contribute to research on workplace innovation by identifying tasks within industrial Lean Production Systems LPS that can trigger the involvement of teams in workplace innovation. Participation in forming the standardization of work is linked to managerial style, which can be changed and developed also lqntz a lean concept.
Within the production all tasks that go beyond the production when it runs well, involve other functions. The results are based on work task analysis two studies and questionnaires.