These journalists published the back seat conversations in a book with the name “The Endstra-Tapes” omitting only fillers such as “um” and. Commentaar op de Endstra-Tapes zaak over de vraag of op de ‘ achterbankgesprekken’ auteursrecht rust. De auteur meent van wel en bekritiseert de uitspraak. These journalists published these conversations in a book with the name ‘the Endstra-tapes’ only omitting too many ‘ers’, dots and certain.
|Published (Last):||1 December 2006|
|PDF File Size:||8.38 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||6.8 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
For this, they inter alia assert that the back seat conversations were conducted in an interview form and that these interviews are to be designated as a work in the meaning of the Copyright Act and are therefore copyrighted like a painting or endstea.
Netherlands : No Copyright in Recorded Conversations with Extortion Victim
Rene added it Feb 09, As long as there is an original expression this will generally be endstea. No trivia or quizzes yet. One comment Seemingly to say that the quality of the conversation counts? It made an official report of the recordings in January Both the District Court Amsterdam and the Court of Appeal Amsterdam did not find that these conversations are copyrighted. Furthermore, it may in practice be very hard ensstra find out whether a particular form was intentionally chosen.
Integrale weergave van de gesprekken die de Amsterdamse vastgoedmakelaar vermoord in hield met de Criminele Inlichtingendienst van de Amsterdamse politie over zijn contacten met de onderwereld. Germain added it Aug 28, Books by Bart Middelburg. Marco Westrik marked it as to-read Jun 30, How to procure innovation? An enestra must intentionally want to make an intellectual creation.
However, it is not important whether the author has intentionally wanted to tapess a work and has intentionally wanted to make creative choices. Claudia marked it as to-read Nov 24, Although Endstra undoubtedly thought about what he wanted and did not want to release to the endstea and therefore applied a certain selection, he did not intentionally couch his story as a coherent creation and as a result there was no copyright work.
Leonora added it Sep 24, Actually, the Court of Appeal says here that if someone does not intend to make a copyrighted work, no copyrighted work is created.
My saved default Read later Folders shared with you. For publication thereof, permission is required from the Endstra heirs. It is true that there must be human labour and therefore creative choices, but it concerns a characteristic that is to be known from the product itself.
Refresh and try again.
Endstra’s final work? Dutch copyright: scope of protection remains very wide – Lexology
An author must intentionally want to make an intellectual creation, as the Court of Appeal told. To see what your friends thought of this book, please sign up.
Regina rated it liked it Jul 22, Hetty rated it it was ok Jun 22, It is therefore clear that a large diversity of works in the Netherlands enjoy copyright protection. The recordings of the conversations were handed over to the Nationale Recherche National Investigation Bureau.
In tpaes own words, tape court stated:.
Sentina rated it did not like it Nov 06, It is therefore clear that a large diversity of works in The Netherlands enjoy copyright protection. The Court of Appeal said that if someone does not intend to make a copyright work, no copyright work is created. He also yapes the Holleeder-organisation of a large number of murders. Ook moeten eendstra voorwaarden altijd letterlijk worden vermeld. The same conclusion as the first time, but now founded on the judgement of the Supreme Court.
You can leave a responseor trackback from your own site. Back to the Taps. Although the decision was rendered in the very quiet holiday seasons, the first reactions followed soon. To ask other readers questions about De Endstra-tapesplease sign up.
Maarten Van damme rated it did not like it Jun 10, In its own words, the court stated: