Lost Christianities. The Battles for Scripture and the Faiths We Never Knew. Bart D. Ehrman. Shows how early forms of Christianity came to be. These are just a few of the many provocative questions you explore in Lost Christianities: Christian Scriptures and the Battles over Authentication. From Publishers Weekly. What if Marcion’s canon-which consisted only of Luke’s Gospel and Paul’s letters, entirely omitting the Old Testament-had become.
|Published (Last):||12 January 2017|
|PDF File Size:||9.93 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||4.31 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
That’s how a lot of people look on Gnosticism–it seems more like an Eastern religion because its practitioners are interested in acquiring insight and enlightenment rather than salvation through the death of Jesus.
My library Help Advanced Book Search. This is a fascinating book about the diverse early christian cults that existed in the decades immediately following the death of Jesus. In Ehrman’s sensational version of events, the proto-orthodox, through their “machinations,” destroyed these other forms llst Christianity, which are themselves occasionally portrayed as more virtuous or liberating than orthodox Christianity. Certain sects maintained that Jesus was human but not divine, while others said he was divine but not human.
Quickly in orthodox church tradition, our 27 books of the New Testament are all tied directly to the apostles or companions, while other Christian writings are denounced as inauthentic. While he pursued these credentials he was actively serving in different churches, from being a youth pastor at an Evangelical Covenant church to serving a year as interim senior pastor of the Princeton Baptist Church.
Professor Ehrman has two children, a daughter, Kelly, and a son, Derek. On the other hand, it does seem to be more trouble than the subject is worth. But he has done so by leaving out pieces of the puzzle, and christainities cutting others to fit.
To be called a Christian, did you first have to be Jewish? Ehrman examines in depth the battles that raged between “proto-orthodox Christians”–those who eventually compiled the canonical books of the New Testament and standardized Christian belief–and the groups they denounced as heretics and ultimately overcame.
Lost Christianities: The Battles for Scripture and the Faiths We Never Knew
He also looks at accepted Christian thinkers’ arguments and extracts that the argument must have been made to oppose one or more of the opposing views, therefore these other groups or sects of these groups must have had these beliefs. To see what your friends thought of this book, please sign up.
As Jesus said, “Seek and ye shall find. Most recognized Jesus as special, but just couldn’t agree on how his message fit in with his Hebrew origins in a pagan world. It’s all really interesting, and Ehrman is at time humorous and rarely, if ever, boring. Winners, Losers, and the Question of Tolerance. Just a moment while we sign you in to your Goodreads account. He spoke recently with Beliefnet about what Christianity might have become if a different strain had emerged victorious from first-century intellectual battles.
I think the author did a great job of keeping the book very academic and factual, especially with such a sensitive topic as religion. Lost Christianities dis Of the four main strands of Christianity prevalent before the fourth century, only one had what it took to emerge as the religion we know today. I continuously wondered throughout the course of the book why his material is relatively “hidden”. In his book he shows that different religions since the time of Christianity, but what is missing is fundamentalism of the main gospels and the letters were placed in their to prove Paul’s case before Rome.
The author Bart D. And then you have to wonder, if that’s the case, whether Western Christianity would have come to dominate the world as it has.
I must say that this book was a great follow-up to ” Misquoting Jesus: That said, the book makes it clear why the Pauline model succeeded and the others failed the book goes perfectly with Rodney Stark’s classic “How New Religions Succeed” and gives an eye-opening glimpse into how not This is a book that reveals some of the “sausage-making” of religion.
What is relevant is that these “varieties” existed and that their adherents claimed to be followers of Christ, and therefore, presumably, the orthodox have no reason to claim they are orthodox. They would have kept what is now our Gospel of Matthew but maybe not any of the other Gospels.
All of these groups insisted that they upheld the teachings of Jesus and his apostles, and they all possessed writings that bore out their claims, books reputedly produced by Jesus’s own followers. This review, of course, is only scratching the surface of the surface. Will shock more than christanities few lay readers. For a very fine survey of the wide variety of religions of the Second and Third Centuries C.
He is the one whose birth parts the Western calendar into B.
Lost Christianities: The Battles for Scripture and the Faiths We Never Knew by Bart D. Ehrman
Oxford University Press Publication Date: Forgeries and Discoveries Chapter Two: Most chfistianities these “varieties” are not so much lost Christianities as dead Christianities. Ehrman, a recognized authority of early christianity also is a skilled writer, making this a fine introduction to the early chaos that in time coalesced into the christian orthodoxy.
Aug 27, Pamela Tucker rated it it was amazing. After all, we have many different varieties of Christian practices today The process did not take a few months or years.
What if various early Christian writings, such as the Gospel of Thomas or the Secret Gospel of Mark, had been allowed into the canonical New Testament? If Gnostics had become dominant, Christianity would have been quite different from what it is now.
In a world of mostly illiterate, desperately poor people, how was ‘the word’ spread And it’s hard to imagine him converting to one of these other kinds of Christianity. Oxford will simultaneously release Ehrman’s edited anthology Lost Scriptures: And many of the writings chrietianities only been rediscovered in the 20th century.
My favorite part of the book is where Ehrman describes the Jewish origins of Gnosticism. From the Ebionites, who followed the laws of Judaism and used only a version of Matthew as their gospel, to the Marcionites, who only used the letters of Paul and Luke and NO old testament, there were many different interpretations of the religion.
That’s why we listen to these lectures I felt that he gave ample attention to each in order to cover its relevance, at the same time he avoided providing all chrietianities the text in detail which appeared to not really be necessary. The primary factions described throughout were incontestably heretical, but he oversimplifies a bit in the degree to which one side or another held certain beliefs–with a subtle huzzah christianitjes underdogs solely because they differed, and not so much in recognition that some minority out there not belonging to any of the sects may have been most correct.
And people who make that distinction are far more drawn to the New Testament God of love. Some believed that the world had not been created by God but by a lesser, ignorant deity.