The Convention was adopted on 14 April by the United Nations Conference on Diplomatic Intercourse and Immunities held at the Neue Hofburg in Vienna. El Gobierno garantizó ayer que Bolivia no dejará de ser miembro de la Convención de Viena de sobre estupefacientes porque un mes antes de que la. Que dicho Convenio fue suscrito en el marco de la Convención Unica de Estupefacientes, de 30 de marzo de , publicada en el aprobada en Viena el 20 de diciembre de ; Reconociendo que ambos Estados se.
|Published (Last):||25 February 2004|
|PDF File Size:||3.14 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||13.70 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
If the authorities of the receiving State have serious grounds for believing that the diplomatic bag contains something which, pursuant to article 27, paragraph 4, of the Convention, may not be sent in the diplomatic bag, they may demand that the bag be opened in the presence of the representative of the diplomatic mission concerned.
In letters addressed to the Secretary-General in regard to the above-mentioned communications, the Permanent Representative of China to the United Nations stated that the Republic of China, a sovereign State and Member of the United Nations, had attended the Conference vviena Diplomatic Intercourse and Immunities, contributed to the formulation of the Convention concerned, signed the Convention and duly deposited the instrument of ratification thereof, and that “any statements and reservations relating to the above-mentioned Convention that are incompatible with or derogatory to the legitimate position of the Government of the Republic of China shall in no way affect the rights and obligations of the Republic of China under this Convention”.
In accordance with the principle of the equality of rights of States, the Viiena of Soviet Socialist Republics considers that any difference of opinion regarding the size of a diplomatic mission should be settled by agreement between the sending State and the receiving State.
Venezuela Bolivarian Republic of.
Subsequently, in a communication addressed to the Secretary-General concerning the communication made by the Permanent Representative of Romania, the Permanent Observer of the Republic of Korea to the United Nations stated the following: United States of America. Ecuador 19 Ecuador Therefore the Government of Japan does vieja regard as valid the reservations concerning article 27 viea the Convention made by the Government of Bahrain and the Government of Qatar on 2 November and 6 Junerespectively.
Subsequently, the Government of Czechoslovakia communicated objections to various reservations and declarations. This declaration is not to be regarded as preventing the Convention’s entry into force as between the French Republic and the People’s Republic of China.
The abuse, observed in flagrante delicto, of the diplo- matic bag for unlawful purposes incompatible with the aims of the relevant rule of immunity, by putting therein items other that the diplomatic documents and articles for official use mentioned in para. If the authorities of the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia suspect that the diplomatic pouch or any parcel therein contains matters which may not be sent through the diplomatic pouch, such authorities may request the opening of the parcel in their presence and in the presence of a representative appointed by the diplomatic mission concerned.
Further, the Government of the United Kingdom do not regard the statement concerning paragraph 1 of article 11 of the Convention made by the Byelorussian Soviet Socialist Republic, the Ukrainian Soviet Socialist Republic and the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics as modifying any rights and obligations under that paragraph. The Government of the United States, however, considers the Con- vention as continuing in force between it and the respective above-mentioned States except for the provisions to which the reservations are addressed in each case.
Vienna Convention – Wikipedia
The Government of the Socialist Republic of Viet Nam, therefore, holds the view that all States have the right to adhere to the said Convention. It is contrary to fundamental principles of diplomatic international law.
Declarations and Reservations Unless otherwise indicated, the declarations and reservations were made upon ratification, accession or convencipn. The Kingdom of the Netherlands does not accept the declaration by the State of Bahrain concerning article 27, para- graph 3 of the Convention. See also note 1 under “China” in the “Historical Information” section in viea front matter of this volume. It takes the view that these provisions remain in force in relations between it and the said States in accordance with international customary law.
If the authorities of the sending state refuse to comply with such a request, the diplomatic bag shall be sent back to the place of origin. The Ukrainian Soviet Socialist Republic considers it necess- ary to draw attention to the discriminatory nature of articles 48 and 50 of the Convention, under the terms of which a number of States are precluded from acceding to the Convention. United Republic of Tanzania.
In respect of the reservation made by the Mongolian People’s Republic concerning article Vienna Convention on Diplomatic Relations. None of these declarations shall be regarded as an obstacle to the entry into force of the Convention between the French Republic and the States mentioned.
In accordance with the principle of equality, no State has the right to bar other States from accession to a convention of this kind. The bag will not be opened except with the approval by the Foreign Ministry. The provisions of these convenciion are inconsistent with the very nature of the Con- vention, which is universal in character and should be open for accession by all States.
The Government of the Kingdom of Thailand does not regard as valid the reservation made by the State of Bahrain in respect of paragraph 3 of article 27 of the Convention. Portugal 23 Portugal For convencionn text of the declaration, see United Nations, Treaty Seriesvol. On 1 Junethe Government of Czechoslovakia communicated the following objections: It takes the view that this provision remains in force in relations between it and the State of Qatar in accordance with international customary law.
Slovakia 5 Slovakia 5.