In Philosophical Fragments the pseudonymous author Johannes Climacus explored the Concluding Unscientific Postscript to Philosophical Fragments. This chapter offers a reading of Søren Kierkegaard’s philosophical work Concluding Unscientific Postscript to ‘Philosophical Fragments’ to illuminate his ideas. Concluding Unscientific Postscript to Philosophical Fragments, Volume 1 has ratings and 14 reviews. John said: In many ways, this book is necessary w.
|Published (Last):||7 March 2014|
|PDF File Size:||2.62 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||11.33 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
Dec 17, Lynn Silsby rated it it was amazing. In many ways, this book is necessary while also being provocative. Certainly Tillich, who is often critical of Hegel, nearly always speaks in praise of Kierkegaard, and he gives such an important place in his own thinking to the category of existence that he seems at times to be travelling in the Danish thinker’s footsteps.
Phiilosophical early work was written under various pseudonyms who present their own distinctive viewpoints in a complex dialogue. And that encounter between system and anti-system is very relevant to any examination of philosophical theology to-day.
Do not read his work This does not suffice to solve the riddle of the Revocation.
Concluding Unscientific Postscript to Philosophical Fragments – Wikipedia
Extreme rated it it was amazing Feb 24, Return to Book Page. And Kierkegaard himself should not be called the father of modern existentialism.
Don’t have an account? This article about a book on metaphysics is a stub. My favorite of Kierkegaard’s works and the book that has had the most impact philosophically on me. postzcript
Concluding Unscientific Postscript to Philosophical Fragments, Volume 1
Just a moment while we sign you in to your Posfscript account. Like his other pseudonymous works, the Postscript is not a reflection of Kierkegaard’s own beliefs.
Part One of the text volume examines the truth of Christianity as an objective issue, Part Two the subjective issue of what is involved for the individual in becoming a Christian, and the volume ends with an addendum in which Kierkegaard acknowledges and explains his relation to the pseudonymous authors and their writings. Trivia About Concluding Unscie Most philosophers are bad writers. Everything is relative, they say, but at the same time they unscientiific as indubitable truth that the mind is nothing but a product of cerebral processes.
Angela rated it really liked it Jun 14, At once ironic, humorous, and polemical, this work takes on the “unscientific” form of a mimical-pathetical-dialectical compilation of ideas. It is a colossal achievement. George Cotkin, Existential America Baltimore: It discusses Christianity’s content by means of analogies which it keeps taking back, citing variations on the formula understanding is revocationn, Apart from this last sceptical stage, it must be said that modem spiritual evolution has been taking unambiguously the line of a more or less materialistic objectivism.
Does that mean those people are Christian? Here is Hannay’s version in full: The book also includes a useful chronology, a well-chosen list of recommended secondary works, and helpful translator’s notes alongside the text.
This fact can be a convenience, but it can also be a curse; in borderline cases, it tempts the translator to sacrifice English clarity for sharper surface echoes of the Danish. But how cruel and false of you, I thought, if you use it to terrify others, perhaps upset every so many happy, loving lives that may very well be truly Christian.
It compares a pious idolater, one who prays to his idol “with all the passion of infinity”to a Christian who pays mere lip service to the genuine God. Having made these distinctions, the Postscript then tries to specify the Christian’s peculiar predicament as a sinner seeking salvation in an absurdity.
The second-stage Hong edition puts it similarly: There are no discussion topics on this book yet. Feb 15, David Tye rated it it was amazing. In the name of Christian faith Kierkegaard rejected not this or that element in Hegelianism but the whole, referring to it in mockery as c the System.
Concluding Unscientific Postscript to Philosophical Fragments, Volume 2 by Søren Kierkegaard
Do those things make one a Christian? Through the discipline of resignation, aiming at an absolute commitment to the highest good, through the discipline of suffering, through the consciousness of guilt, the way leads step by step to a more profound pathos, until by a leap we reach the absolute maximum of subjectivity in the Christian consciousness of sin, with its imperative need for a new departure. To see what your friends thought of philoeophical book, please sign up.
Frankel rated it really liked it Jun 22, If a second edition is issued, I suggest that such references be added. His virtue, for the reader, is that he sees the way to the top, while his value depends on his not having got there; for then he would have disappeared from view” xvii.