The Gulf War Did Not Take Place is a collection of three short essays by Jean Baudrillard published in the French newspaper Libération and British paper The . View latest Jean Baudrillard’s Documents. Jean Baudrillard’s Documents. Home · Jean Baudrillard’s La guerra del Golfo no ha tenido lugar. Read more. La guerra del Golfo no ha tenido lugar / Jean Baudrillard ; traducción de Thomas Kauf.
|Published (Last):||9 June 2013|
|PDF File Size:||20.96 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||2.93 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
Must we denounce the speed of light? Views Read Edit View history.
La guerra del Golfo no ha tenido lugar – Jean Baudrillard – Google Books
War as videogame distraction from the suffering it inflicts. Thus, the fighting “did not baudrillagd take place” from the point of view of the West. Jul 16, David Daugherty rated it really liked it.
The real trouble begins when Baudrillard attempts to describe “reality,” because in using the word “reality” to mean “one person’s subjective truth” postmodernists like Baudrillard muddle the distinction between fact and interpretation, and sometimes use the muddle dishonestly. The real is not only what can be reproduced, but that which is always already reproduced: When a Kuwaiti friend of mine saw the b I don’t know whether this piece by crazy French theorist Jean Baudrillard Died recently is faulty in its logic or if I am just not capable of comprehending what the hell he is trying to say.
Baudrillard argued the Gulf War was not really a war, but rather an atrocity which masqueraded as a war.
The Gulf War Did Not Take Place
The preface even states that the facts openly contradict the central thesis of the book. But he doesn’t do anything of the sort. Books by Jean Baudrillard. Moreover, all that spectators got to know about the war was in the form of propaganda imagery. Confronted by a hysteric, the other becomes paranoid, he deploys a massive appar I may just be easy to please, as I haven’t read much philosophy, but Baudrillard just does not leave me disappointed. This is true, but hardly profound or original; “In war, truth is the first casualty” has been attributed to Aeschylus two and a half millennia ago, and although he gives some modern analysis of this, Baudrillard doesn’t get far beyond it.
The Emperor has no clothes. No trivia or quizzes yet. He is neither mad nor suicidal, perhaps he should be treated by hypnosis?
We will never know what an Iraqi taking part with drl chance of fighting would have been like. Since this war was won in advance. Let me repeat, some of his poitical and sociological stuff is actually rather interesting.
Baudrillard’s argument is coldly i Three essays: I feel better now, anyway. Although I have deep respect for his baudrillarf and ua engaging with it critically, he seems to stand for everything I actively loathe in this book: Apr 20, Joe Mecham rated it it was amazing. It also bluntly states the following: This basically presented a clear instantiated example of hyper-reality for the events unfoldi What is vitally important to understand regarding Baudrillard’s thesis was that it wasn’t a literal denial of the war.
It’s one thing to scare yourself shitless with conspiracy bullshit. I thought this book was largely but not quite entirely provocative nonsense. Saddam will never fight, while the Americans will fight against a fictive double on a screen. When read against Der Derians Virtuous War, one realizes how close to the mark Baudrillard is, especially in light of Schwarzkopfs acquisition of a war game, which became the blueprint for America.
He suspects the hysteric of bad faith, of ruse and dissimulation. This feels like bauudrillard to obscurantism and distorting what is self evident. Aug 05, Mike rated it it was amazing. Reading accounts of the Second Wold War also give testament to war also being fought on an abstract level.
I may just be easy to please, as I haven’t read much philosophy, baudrilllard Baudrillard just does not leave me disappointed. By contrast, baudri,lard has until now succeeded in preventing Bush from giving birth to his.
What Baudrillard means when he says that “the Gulf War did not take place” isn’t to imply that people didn’t die, acts of courage did luga happen or that the war didn’t do any good. Contrary to the title, the author believes that the events and violence of the Gulf War actually took place, whereas the issue is one of interpretation: