The distinction between active and passive euthanasia is thought to be crucial for medical ethics. The idea is that it is James Rachels. James Rachels. The late philosopher James Rachels published one of the most salient pieces on the euthanasia (E) debate in the New England Journal. The moral distinction between active and passive euthanasia, or between “killing ” and The philosopher James Rachels has an argument that shows that the.
|Published (Last):||21 November 2014|
|PDF File Size:||19.87 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||19.96 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
Rickless – – Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 89 1: If “letting die” is always immoral, then one might have a sound moral reason to object to active euthanasia, too.
And if the lazy doctor defended himself to Brown’s mother by saying, “I didn’t kill him. The dagger in his heart killed him,” we wouldn’t think this an adequate moral sctive either. Active euthanasia is sometimes more humane than passive euthanasia.
Now, the conventional doctrine says that letting die is sometimes permissible, whereas killing is always forbidden. We can look at this situation is another way: It holds that it is sometimes permissible to withhold treatment, but it is never permissible to directly kill patients.
Active and passive euthanasia
Smith will gain a large inheritance if his six-year-old cousin dies. Active euthanasia is morally better because it can be quicker and cleaner, and it may be less painful for the patient. If you believe that euthanasia is always wrong, then this section is not worth reading. But if it has no defect, there is nothing we can do. Doctors can withhold treatment in many circumstances, and does nothing wrong if the patient dies, but the doctor must never, ever “kill” the patient.
Margaret Otlowski – – Clarendon Press.
If ethanasia accept that active euthanasia is wrong, then we accept as a universal rule that people should be permitted to suffer severe pain before death if that is the consequence of their disease. Just as Jones enters the bathroom, however, the child slips, hits his head, and falls face down in the water.
Bob Lane – – Humanist Perspectives The refusal of treatment to tachels “defective” newborns, and the subsequent death by dehydration, shows that some cases of letting die are worse than killing. Passive euthanasia occurs when the patient dies because the medical professionals either don’t do something necessary to keep the patient alive, or when they stop doing something that is keeping the patient alive.
James Rachels, Active and passive euthanasia – PhilPapers
Simon Blackburn, Oxford Dictionary of Philosophy. Passivve allowing the patient to continue to live in this state is a greater evil than causing their death.
In this case letting someone die is morally very bad indeed. Rschels that Rachels does not defend active euthanasia killingbecause he never defends the morality of passive euthanasia.
But this isn’t necessarily so:. Arthur Hugh Clough In law Smith is guilty of murder and Jones isn’t guilty of anything.
Hence, it is a mistake to think that killing is intrinsically worse than letting die. While you will be able to view the content of this page in your current browser, you will not be able to get the full visual experience.
No keywords specified fix it. No-one would think that the doctor’s reply excused him in any way. Not everyone would agree that this is the right way to argue. Active and passive euthanasia.
I didn’t kill him; I only let him die. It demonstrates that some cases of letting die are at least as bad as killing.
History of Western Philosophy. But this isn’t necessarily so: Only rules that apply to everyone can be accepted One well-known ethical principle says that we should only be guided by moral principles that we would accept should be followed by everyone. Acts and omissions This is one of the classic ideas in ethics.
James Rachels’ “Active and Passive Euthanasia”
The conventional doctrine should be rejected because it leads to decisions about life and death made on irrelevant grounds. Douglas Walton – – Ethics 86 4: As Rachels notes, the AMA takes a similar stand. Find out more about page archiving.